From owner-freebsd-standards@freebsd.org  Sat Jan 30 05:45:28 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC98A7218A
 for <freebsd-standards@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 30 Jan 2016 05:45:28 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C66C011C6
 for <freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 05:45:28 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u0U5jS0V085468
 for <freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 05:45:28 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 206146] fileno(3) should be implemented as a function; need to
 check other functions as well
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 05:45:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: standards
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: lichray@gmail.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-206146-15-dTcHvWZFBx@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-206146-15@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-206146-15@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Standards compliance <freebsd-standards.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-standards>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-standards/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 05:45:29 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206146

--- Comment #5 from lichray@gmail.com ---
(In reply to David Chisnall from comment #4)

Right now, to C++, the only issue left is whether the shortcut implementati=
ons
can be called, since those macros are already being guarded against
__cplusplus.  The complexity of this change went beyond my expectation.

And wrt performance, the cases actually matter are getc/putc...

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=