Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Jan 2012 11:07:15 +0000
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Joel Dahl <joel@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pfg@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r229430 - in head/sys: conf dev/sound/pci modules/sound/driver/emu10k1
Message-ID:  <20120104110715.GB3811@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120104085453.GD61584@goofy01.vnodelab.local>
References:  <201201032104.q03L4sTm043158@svn.freebsd.org> <201201031615.06873.jhb@freebsd.org> <20120104085453.GD61584@goofy01.vnodelab.local>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 09:54:53AM +0100, Joel Dahl wrote:
> The emu10k1 and emu10kx drivers essentially support the same hardware, with
> a few exceptions (if memory serves me right -- I think there are a few cards
> that emu10kx does not support, someone should check with Yuriy). However,
> emu10kx has a few nice features like optional multichannel and MIDI I/O
> support...

How hard would it be to (re)implement missing features with emu10k1 and nuke
GPL-polluted emu10kx?

./danfe



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120104110715.GB3811>