Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:49:37 +0300 From: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>, Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org>, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: if_bridge.ko requires INET6... Message-ID: <20060202134937.GM29980@comp.chem.msu.su> In-Reply-To: <200602021437.38385.max@love2party.net> References: <20060201005658.A70005@xorpc.icir.org> <20060202070149.GD18601@ip.net.ua> <20060202124328.GK29980@comp.chem.msu.su> <200602021437.38385.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:37:28PM +0100, Max Laier wrote: > On Thursday 02 February 2006 13:43, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > > This needs to be fixed in pf then. > > > > Max Laier and I discussed this issue once, and Max had concern > > over possible performance degradation that might result from > > calling pflog functions through pointers to be set by a separate > > pflog module. We can skip touching the pf module in RELENG_6 for > > now and leave the issue to after 6.1-RELEASE is out. > > I have convinced myself that we should really use a function pointer here. I > will try to commit a sollution to HEAD over the weekend. If you are MFC'ing > the changes *now*, I'd appreciate if you could spare out pf, but I am willing > to MFC the changes before 6.1 if testing goes well. Thank you, Max! Let me assure you I won't touch modules/pf in RELENG_6 until you think it is OK to. I'll devote some time to testing the other modules WRT the change in the meanwhile. -- Yar
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060202134937.GM29980>