Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 23:53:23 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> To: Yasuhiro KIMURA <yasu@utahime.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Three '450.status-security' scripts enabled by default Message-ID: <20171103233840.T7397@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <mailman.75.1509710402.96436.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> References: <mailman.75.1509710402.96436.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 700, Issue 5, Message: 5 On Fri, 03 Nov 2017 03:12:32 +0900 (JST) Yasuhiro KIMURA <yasu@utahime.org> wrote: > > OMG, again the source of this problem is "pkg". 410.pkg-audit and > > 460.pkg-checksum doesn't support security_status_*_period > > variable. Therefore they are always executed if > > weekly_status_security_enable and/or monthly_status_security_enable is > > 'YES' (and they are 'YES' by default). > > Support of security_status_*_period variable is added to these scripts > on GitHub repository. > > https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/commit/956dcc5f2205168d0ad321b6cc7c25cc473d2314 > https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/commit/cc27c8ce390b96f1fe649f3f5ce2150b2605ed41 > > Just FYI. Thanks. I'd asked Matthew Seaman off-list, who pointed to the first of those commits on github. I see you engaged Bapt@ about the second one. However these are not yet in the FreeBSD ports tree head, so presumably there will be a new version of pkg(8) coming along sometime after that. Amazing noine else seems to have noticed these extra security messages. cheers, Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171103233840.T7397>