From owner-freebsd-mobile  Wed Nov  5 03:13:55 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-mobile>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA03373
          for mobile-outgoing; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 03:13:55 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mobile)
Received: from word.smith.net.au (ppp13.portal.net.au [202.12.71.113])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA03364
          for <mobile@freebsd.org>; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 03:13:46 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au)
Received: from word.smith.net.au (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA00341;
	Wed, 5 Nov 1997 21:39:48 +1030 (CST)
Message-Id: <199711051109.VAA00341@word.smith.net.au>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
cc: mobile@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: APM 1.2 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 05 Nov 1997 00:31:11 PDT."
             <199711050731.AAA17137@harmony.village.org> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 1997 21:39:46 +1030
From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Casually browsing the apm sources, i've noticed that 1.0 and 1.1 versions of
> apm are supported.  the apm command tells me my machine supports 1.2.  what
> does 1.2 add over 1.1?

0.1?  8)

Seriously, the APM specs are online on Microsoft's site, should you 
wish to compare the various revisions.  I only have a hardcopy of 1.1, 
as the Sharp I was working on was there.  Now I'm on a Toshiba and at 
1.2, I want to update.

mike