From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 12 17:27:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62909648; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cg@cgross.info) Received: from alpha.kreiz-it.fr (alpha.kreiz-it.fr [178.32.219.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD5E2E92; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DirTech (lnr56-1-82-246-51-185.fbx.proxad.net [82.246.51.185]) by alpha.kreiz-it.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87462444; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 19:26:55 +0200 (CEST) From: "Cedric GROSS" To: "'Adrian Chadd'" References: <001d01ce9694$142db8b0$3c892a10$@info> <003c01ce96b5$15c93d40$415bb7c0$@info> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [iwn]Review Split 6 Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 19:26:53 +0200 Message-ID: <00c601ce9781$25060550$6f120ff0$@info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac6WtXBwqAuWnkeuSOSTW/BwQwU5ugAy3hRQ Content-Language: fr Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:27:03 -0000 > De=A0: adrian.chadd@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.chadd@gmail.com] De la = part > de Adrian Chadd > Envoy=E9=A0: dimanche 11 ao=FBt 2013 19:09 > =C0=A0: Cedric GROSS > Cc=A0: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org > Objet=A0: Re: [iwn]Review Split 6 >=20 > On 11 August 2013 10:06, Cedric GROSS wrote: >=20 > > U1 stand for unit 1. > > As you see, all function with this prefix will be call when = unit=3D=3D1 > > within iwn_vap_create. > > > > As previously, I haven't investigate a lot this side. I plan to do = so > > when standard run will be ok. >=20 > Right. But what's going on, per se? Is it two separate NICs that show > up as separate PCI devices? Or is this a hack so the firmware can > present two virtual NICs via the firmware API? >=20 Not a separate PCI device but yes ability to create 2 wlan NIC : iwn0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu = 2290 ether 60:36:dd:93:34:56 nd6 options=3D29 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11ng status: associated wlan0: flags=3D8943 = metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 60:36:dd:93:34:56 inet 192.168.1.20 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 nd6 options=3D29 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet MCS mode 11ng status: associated ssid WLenine channel 5 (2432 MHz 11g ht/20) bssid = 00:24:d4:97:80:20 country US authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF AES-CCM 2:128-bit txpower 15 bmiss 10 scanvalid 450 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 64 protmode = CTS ampdulimit 64k -amsdutx amsdurx shortgi wme roaming MANUAL = bintval 96 wlan1: flags=3D8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 60:36:dd:93:34:57 nd6 options=3D29 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (autoselect) status: no carrier ssid "" channel 5 (2432 MHz 11g ht/20) country US authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpower 15 bmiss 10 = scanvalid 60 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 64 protmode CTS ampdulimit 8k -amsdutx amsdurx shortgi wme bintval = 0