From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 19 20:15:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4BE210656A8 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:15:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout024.mac.com (asmtpout024.mac.com [17.148.16.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDBE08FC08 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:15:49 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp024.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L7E00JMWYTF4N90@asmtp024.mac.com> for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:15:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1008190151 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-08-19_09:2010-08-19, 2010-08-19, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <4C6D8117.7020200@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:15:14 -0700 Message-id: <1273D003-C9CA-47EE-8E50-E5D626869E26@mac.com> References: <4C6D8117.7020200@freebsd.org> To: freebsd security X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Subject: Re: FreeBSD-SA-10:07.mbuf exploit in the wild X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:15:49 -0000 Hi-- On Aug 19, 2010, at 12:08 PM, FreeBSD Security Officer wrote: > If you haven't updated your affected systems for FreeBSD-SA-10:07.mbuf yet, > there's another reason to do it now: Exploit code was posted earlier today > to the full-disclosure list. Is it confirmed that this advisory does *not* apply to RELENG_6_4...? Regards, -- -Chuck