From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 16 23:13:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D69A106566B for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:13:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@obluda.cz) Received: from smtp1.ms.mff.cuni.cz (smtp1.ms.mff.cuni.cz [IPv6:2001:718:1e03:801::4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37678FC13 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kgw.obluda.cz (kgw.obluda.cz [193.179.199.50]) by smtp1.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8GNDMDS067149 for ; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 01:13:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dan@obluda.cz) Message-ID: <4E73D812.8000201@obluda.cz> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 01:13:22 +0200 From: Dan Lukes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110908 Firefox/6.0.2 SeaMonkey/2.3.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-security References: <86boukbk8s.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86boukbk8s.fsf@ds4.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: PAM modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:13:31 -0000 On 09/16/11 17:05, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav: > My question is: which ones? An anti-brutal force module would be nice. security/pam_af is my favorite. Configurable, fast, BSD license. Dan