From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Feb 26 01:01:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA20147 for freebsd-emulation-outgoing; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 01:01:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA20142 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 01:01:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA23309; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 00:59:59 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199802260859.AAA23309@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: The Hermit Hacker cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG, dufault@hda.com Subject: Re: Kudos... In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 24 Feb 1998 01:14:18 -0400." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 00:59:58 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > The only thing that I don't know if can be fixed (or even matters), but > x11amp does generate: > > sched_setscheduler: Function not implemented > > It doesn't seem to affect performance or how it operates though... No; this is (sort of) the Linux equivalent of the FreeBSD rtprio stuff. x11amp is attempting to change the scheduling algorithm that's applied to it to improve its chances of keeping up. We had some Posix scheduler stuff done, but I think we fumbled the ball. If Peter Dufault is still around he would be able to answer that better. Peter? -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message