Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 23:21:02 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternatives to SYSV IPC? Message-ID: <Mutt.19970224232102.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199702240814.AAA07697@freefall.freebsd.org>; from Darren Reed on Feb 24, 1997 19:14:16 %2B1100 References: <3311084E.794BDF32@whistle.com> <199702240814.AAA07697@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Darren Reed wrote: > > how come no-one uses AF_LOCAL with SOCK_DGRAM? > > how portable is AF_LOCAL ? I think it's the posixized expression that avoids the U-word. It's very portable. :-) #ifndef AF_LOCAL # define AF_LOCAL AF_UNIX #endif -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19970224232102.j>