From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jun  1 16:56:27 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0654714D13
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  1 Jun 1999 16:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id TAA18849;
	Tue, 1 Jun 1999 19:56:14 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 19:56:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <199906012356.TAA18849@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>
Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, current@FreeBSD.ORG,
	newton@atdot.dotat.org
Subject: Re: IRQ sharing with newbus
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9906012244320.411-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>
References: <199906011936.FAA11098@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
	<Pine.BSF.4.05.9906012244320.411-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

<<On Tue, 1 Jun 1999 22:46:40 +0100 (BST), Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> said:

> I don't think the sio multiport stuff needs to use RF_SHAREABLE - the
> master device knows how to field interrupts for the slaves (at least thats
> how I understood it).

But the sio non-multiport stuff should be able to use RF_TIMESHARE. --
If I'm not using my serial port, I should be able to use my
infrared....

-GAWollman

--
Garrett A. Wollman   | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
wollman@lcs.mit.edu  | O Siem / The fires of freedom 
Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame
MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA|                     - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message