From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 14:22:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B9F16A401 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:22:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from mx1.netclusive.de (mx1.netclusive.de [89.110.132.131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE9413C481 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:22:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Fdd20.f.ppp-pool.de [195.4.221.32]) by mx1.netclusive.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9ACDE804E for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:22:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id B27E915213; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:22:35 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: Christian Baer Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:22:35 +0100 (CET) Organization: Convenimus Projekt Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <539c60b90703010849x33dd4bbbt8f6ca6aa0c8e83a0@mail.gmail.com> <20070301165055.638b0a06.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <44r6s8y4o5.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: garfield.rz1.convenimus.net X-Trace: nermal.rz1.convenimus.net 1172931755 99267 192.168.100.11 (3 Mar 2007 14:22:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@convenimus.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:22:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Subject: Re: defrag X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 14:22:38 -0000 On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:56:30 +0100 Ivan Voras wrote: > "UFS fragmentation" refers to dividing blocks (e.g. 16KB in size) into > block fragments (e.g. 2KB in size) that can be allocated separately in > special circumstances (which all boil down to: at the end of files). > This is done to lessen the effect of internal fragmentation. No, to lessen the loss of disc space. Regards Chris