From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan  6 13:10:32 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EEC16A4CF
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu,  6 Jan 2005 13:10:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.chrononomicon.com (chrononomicon.com [216.37.143.27])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB7343D55
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu,  6 Jan 2005 13:10:32 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com)
Received: from [192.168.0.42] (unknown [192.168.0.42])
	by mail.chrononomicon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164622EB04C
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu,  6 Jan 2005 08:10:31 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
In-Reply-To: <190.36a29286.2f0dcb2d@aol.com>
References: <190.36a29286.2f0dcb2d@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <581843E8-5FE4-11D9-AF88-000D932C89A2@chrononomicon.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bart Silverstrim <bsilver@chrononomicon.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:10:31 -0500
To: FreeBSD Questions <questions@freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:10:32 -0000


On Jan 5, 2005, at 5:58 PM, Tm4528@aol.com wrote:

> The "tranquility" of this list is apparently because the  people on 
> this list
> are too technically incompetent  to realize how badly botched 5.x is.
>
> "thank you master, thank you for helping me get my mouse working, let
> me kiss your boots"

Quick questions...

If you don't like the OS and think everyone is incompetent and you 
could design and implement a better system with your fingers superglued 
together and a blindfold on, why are you using *BSD?

If you're not using *BSD, why are you wasting your time on the list at 
all?