From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan  2 17:38:27 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7639A2233
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Jan 2013 17:38:27 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from feld@feld.me)
Received: from mail.feld.me (mail.feld.me [66.170.3.2])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425A4188A
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Jan 2013 17:38:26 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me;
 s=blargle; 
 h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date;
 bh=pBmYOMjuwzZANRS84CgfTXHHdIwkNz0VMPrHKrlOOV4=; 
 b=KwNvI8FimPrjrDvF3BKisacWw7gHeaHPjbY9HrkrHdtN+aSiQqWZTTy2WFANm8WJ3vaHHrx+1oe93WSXK52EQNxAxkY1ZyTcx3a+hHJNr4DEAw2fpMoAKnaqu0llCXgn;
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org)
 by mail.feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <feld@feld.me>)
 id 1TqSGi-000IxV-3u; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:38:20 -0600
Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4)
 with esmtpa id 1357148294-10079-10078/5/3; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 17:38:14
 +0000
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:38:13 -0600
From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me>
To: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com
Subject: Re: is csup broken?
Message-Id: <20130102113813.2e9d42cf@tech304.office.supranet.net>
In-Reply-To: <50E45B78.5040609@a1poweruser.com>
References: <50E44EC9.6070301@a1poweruser.com>
 <20130102162025.d7ef8fd5.freebsd@edvax.de>
 <50E4539E.7050803@a1poweruser.com>
 <20130102164728.abc6cc34.freebsd@edvax.de>
 <50E45B78.5040609@a1poweruser.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5
X-SA-Score: -1.5
Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:38:27 -0000

On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:08:24 -0500
fbsd8@a1poweruser.com wrote:

> This 9.1 release was released prematurely. It has more problems
> them 5.0 had which had a re-release 2 weeks later to fix problems.

This is FUD. Stop being afraid of change.

Users use portsnap
Power users use svn

There's no use trying to cover everyone's edge cases. You'll never keep =
everyone happy.

> Now I just had a port I maintain committed yesterday
> and I have no way to test it to verify the port is working.

Please don't commit ports to the ports tree if you have not tested them!