From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Jan 22 23:48:10 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA04603
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 22 Jan 1997 23:48:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns.tp.silkera.net (ns.tp.silkera.net [203.70.2.9])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA04549;
          Wed, 22 Jan 1997 23:47:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dorothy.bsd.zerodist.com (ts62-ip78.tp.silkera.net [203.70.2.78])
          by ns.tp.silkera.net (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id PAA29102; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:49:59 +0800 (CST)
Message-ID: <32E71839.4BA@ms2.hinet.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 15:50:17 +0800
From: zerodist <zerodist@ms2.hinet.net>
Reply-To: zerodist@ms2.hinet.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org,
        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Ip masquerade and sockd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

My LAN is using IPs from 192.168.x.x. Using sockd, netscape browser
can browse Internet from any PC in the LAN. 
 Is this the main functionality of IP masquerrade? If so, why not use
sockd?

Thanks.