From owner-freebsd-current Mon Oct 11 19:57:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from wint.itfs.nsk.su (wint.itfs.nsk.su [212.20.32.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE5F14BF9 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 1999 19:57:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nnd@wint.itfs.nsk.su) Received: (from nnd@localhost) by wint.itfs.nsk.su (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA80657; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 09:57:14 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from nnd) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 09:57:14 +0700 (NOVST) Message-Id: <199910120257.JAA80657@wint.itfs.nsk.su> From: nnd@mail.nsk.ru To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel broken? (pcm) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-19990927 ("Nine While Nine") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.0-CURRENT (i386)) Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 1999 nnd@mail.nsk.ru wrote: > >> In <199910111931.VAA52411@work.net.local> A.Leidinger@wjpserver.cs.uni-sb.de wrote: >> Such an errors results from (uncommented) kernel option >> >> #makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin > > We have enough breakages with the _documented_ kernel options that we > don't need to go hunting down oddities. :> Does it mean that I throw away my PR with patches to the 'newpcm' files which add 'abs' definition and therefore make it possible to make kernel with makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin ? P.S. It seems to me that this option (or its absent) can severely influence kernel run time efficience (not in the 'abs' case, of course ;-). N.Dudorov To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message