From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Nov 1 12: 3:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87636152E4 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 12:03:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA07093 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 21:03:02 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id VAA74905 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 21:03:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (ns.mt.sri.com [206.127.79.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B8C14A2F for ; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 12:02:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA17352; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 13:02:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id NAA18614; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 13:02:34 -0700 Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 13:02:34 -0700 Message-Id: <199911012002.NAA18614@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Peter Dufault Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, julian@whistle.com, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threads models and FreeBSD. In-Reply-To: <199911011936.OAA18744@hda.hda.com> References: <199911010221.TAA13961@mt.sri.com> <199911011936.OAA18744@hda.hda.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > but that's wrong.. the memory is shared.. > > > only the %sp register is differnet.. > > > > Right, my bad. > > > > Here's what I wrote to Sean. > > > > Thread share everything that a normal process, including a > > thread-specific stack which is used to keep each thread's context > > seperate from one another. > > I haven't caught up with you guys yet. This is what > I asked about POSIX threading before: can stack be private per > thread? I don't believe so, although each thread does have it's own stack, it's not private. Sean would know more though.... Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message