From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Sep 3 12:08:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA01496 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 12:08:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from localhost.my.domain (ppp1609.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.249.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA01433; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 12:07:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hoek@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from tim@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA02717; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 14:18:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tim) Message-ID: <19980903141831.B311@zappo> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1998 14:18:31 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek To: Satoshi Asami , cracauer@cons.org Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, vanilla@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Some -devel ports break autoconf (gtk11 spotted) References: <19980819142241.A29002@cons.org> <199809031315.GAA19660@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <199809031315.GAA19660@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from Satoshi Asami on Thu, Sep 03, 1998 at 06:15:03AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Sep 03, 1998 at 06:15:03AM -0700, Satoshi Asami wrote: > > * So I think it would be more wise to create a > * $(PREFIX)/share/aclocal.current/ directory, where ports with possibly > * conflicting aclocal parts could place them and maintainers of > * depending ports could easily address them. > > Vanilla, can you put gtk10 aclocal files here? Did anyone ask the autoconf developers for any suggestions? -- This .sig is not innovative, witty, or profund. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message