Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:13:50 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192828] [new port] add squid34 to ports Message-ID: <bug-192828-13-hV9pz3yD6g@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-192828-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-192828-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192828 --- Comment #29 from timp87@gmail.com --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #28) > (In reply to takefu from comment #25) > > (In reply to timp87 from comment #24) > > Kerberos-related is corrupt. > > Especially in the clang is mad 'common'. > > Wait for the fix in the upstream. > > I thought we are waiting for upstream as takefu said, "wait". > > I'm actually fine with waiting until 15 September. > If we put it in before, we have to call it www/squid34 and then move it to > www/squid after www/squid is removed. > > We can't call it www/squid *NOW* because there's a port there. Ok, understood. I hope the upstream knows about that problem at least. takefu, do you have any additional info? Dennis Glatting, I looked at patches that you provided for initial version of this port. Sorry, if I ask stupid questions, but: Are all of them still valid for 3.4.6? For xample, is files/patch-src_base_Vector.h still valid? There was a similar fix included in 3.4.3 http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v3/3.4/changesets/squid-3.4-13082.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-192828-13-hV9pz3yD6g>