From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 21 20:47:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D651065716; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:47:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94DA78FC22; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyb11 with SMTP id 11so178504iyb.13 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:47:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to; bh=OBi2YDWd0EY9eyhL0HpLTRbVdut4hVJvq8NN22bozvs=; b=pvgUMnsb8Wd+MmuujKWDTCEDUtFf2VCX1PTXQibAGpt8cQoDyhB/FSV5PiS/T3SdBt RXtna5VSj2/zEIJMP9CTmAozcUBI0Rq0qZ9BK0Gc8+VmKh5YicWGE4BCDNZLQ+0l2b+9 4GSYlbcO/urcZeLiaSknRYSJaBMDKP+txZe98= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to; b=tsxrAsX/JvXWNC6BugPq0t7bKbYOOgy/NEXYiPIzSaJJxTNWBa+0Mtl1RU3rmbRkw/ O29vQxHNXpcjIT5Lolj5uGttVv+h/2H5C6oaYzU6VisrHMv0Uli+68aSmHyXwmc0HwMk V1VjVsFZSqqK3JzuC4uMgjMWsSz0A1BHb0b7E= Received: by 10.42.172.197 with SMTP id o5mr7066992icz.145.1308689223061; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:47:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from disbatch.dataix.local (adsl-99-19-44-84.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net [99.19.44.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a9sm7100247icy.6.2011.06.21.13.47.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Sender: "J. Hellenthal" Received: from disbatch.dataix.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disbatch.dataix.local (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p5LKkv9e015588 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:46:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhell@DataIX.net) Received: (from jhell@localhost) by disbatch.dataix.local (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id p5LKkvvY015587; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:46:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhell@DataIX.net) Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:46:57 -0400 From: jhell To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20110621204657.GA13736@DataIX.net> References: <4E00F5A9.6040900@FreeBSD.org> <20110621200214.GB62312@DataIX.net> <4E00FDD7.3060204@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E00FDD7.3060204@FreeBSD.org> Cc: sunpoet@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: shells/ksh93 install fail X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:47:04 -0000 On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:23:51PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 6/21/2011 1:02 PM, jhell wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:48:57PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > >> An effort to upgrade to 20110208_1 is failing for me: > >> > >> ===> Installing for ksh93-20110208_1 > >> ===> Generating temporary packing list > >> ===> Checking if shells/ksh93 already installed > >> install -o root -g wheel -m 555 > >> /usr/local/tmp/usr/ports/shells/ksh93/work/bin/ksh /usr/local/bin/ksh93 > >> install: $WRKDIRPREFIX/usr/ports/shells/ksh93/work/bin/ksh: No such file > >> or directory > >> *** Error code 71 > >> > >> Is it possible that $WRKDIRPREFIX is the trigger? > >> > > > > I did not actually see that here on 8-STABLE/i386, just for the record. > > Thanks. At least one person on IRC said that it worked for them with or > without $WRKDIRPREFIX, so that's probably not it. What's odd is that > these package building systems have been working fine for hundreds of > ports for quite a while now, so I'm stumped. > How about your WRKDIRPREFIX var in make.conf ? I have mine set here to: WRKDIRPREFIX?=/usr/obj Also contained within an .if conditional for ports but that shouldnt matter. Though the difference of having something like ':=' '?=' '=' I don't think should make much of a difference unless something else strange is being set or happening elsewhere. Just a thought.