From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Thu Mar 22 16:31:02 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69635F5418C for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:31:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 071AD7DF14 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:31:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63AF247AA for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:31:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w2MGV1Lg048333 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:31:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w2MGV1PF048311 for freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:31:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 226850] [pf] Matching but failed rules block without return Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:31:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: vegeta@tuxpowered.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter attachments.created Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:31:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D226850 Bug ID: 226850 Summary: [pf] Matching but failed rules block without return Product: Base System Version: 11.1-RELEASE Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: kern Assignee: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: vegeta@tuxpowered.net Created attachment 191739 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D191739&action= =3Dedit Support "return" statements in passing rules when they fail. Normally pf rules are expected to do one of two things: pass the traffic or block it. Blocking can be silent - "drop", or loud - "return", "return-rst", "return-icmp". Yet there is a 3rd category of traffic passing through pf. Packets matching a "pass" rule but when applying the rule fails. This happe= ns when redirection table is empty or when src node or state creation fails. S= uch rules always fail silently without notifying the sender. Please see proposed patch for adding "return"-like keywords to "pass" rules just as "block" rules do. Other option would be to not change pf.conf's gra= mmar and just make such rules always returning. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=