From owner-freebsd-java Fri Mar 15 4:50:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from puget.esil.univ-mrs.fr (puget.esil.univ-mrs.fr [139.124.41.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62FA37B427 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 04:50:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (hquiroz@localhost) by puget.esil.univ-mrs.fr (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g2FCvq348676; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:57:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hquiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr) X-Authentication-Warning: puget.esil.univ-mrs.fr: hquiroz owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:57:52 +0100 (CET) From: Herve Quiroz To: Ernst de Haan Cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Location of javadoc In-Reply-To: <200203151227.g2FCRfS12133@zaphod.euronet.nl> Message-ID: <20020315134621.I48668-100000@puget.esil.univ-mrs.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ernst, > > What if I create a PORTDOCS_JAVA variable for this in the bsd.java.mk ? > > > > ${PREFIX}/share/doc/java/${PKGNAME}/api > > And perhaps a APIDOCS_JAVA for this? > > I dunno, I want to think about this anyway, I don't want to bloat > bsd.java.mk... I'm not sure this would be a good thing to do... > This could be the way to have all java relatad ports unified in the way they are installing data, docs, apidocs and classes. Indeed, people are more likely to use defined variables if they exist when otherwise they would do as they intend to, which may possibly not match the discussed "unified" way. Herv=E9 PS: BTW, don't you think PORTAPIDOCS is more significant than APIDOCS_JAVA (which sounds more like a "global" variable and not an installing port related one) ? -I'm just splitting hairs here ;) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message