From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 26 01:27:53 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4288922;
 Mon, 26 Aug 2013 01:27:53 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E07C2E85;
 Mon, 26 Aug 2013 01:27:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from trevally.dhcp.nue.suse.com (nat.nue.novell.com [195.135.221.2])
 by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06C963F418;
 Sun, 25 Aug 2013 21:27:51 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 03:27:50 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bernhard_Fr=F6hlich?= <decke@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc
In-Reply-To: <CAE-m3X2U_OuJRawZZLROvZ3+R1012QZ2aCK4tS65WnYkbZLwCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1308260313160.3920@trevally.site>
References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com>
 <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org>
 <CAE-m3X324rbdP_C=az4eO-EkMcR-yFAeRG7S4q+MUsnMezGddw@mail.gmail.com>
 <521751AF.6040905@gmail.com>
 <CAE-m3X2U_OuJRawZZLROvZ3+R1012QZ2aCK4tS65WnYkbZLwCQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1041702911-1377480255=:3920"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 02:40:28 +0000
Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org, Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>,
 John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>, current@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 01:27:53 -0000

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--0-1041702911-1377480255=:3920
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT

On Fri, 23 Aug 2013, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> lang/gcc42 is on the list of ports that have USE_GCC=any. So you would 
> need to fix it first to be able to compile it with clang 3.3 from base.

I don't think so. :-)

You can install lang/gcc which builds just fine with clang, and
then use lang/gcc to build lang/gcc42.

In fact, if you have a system without GCC in the base, this should 
happen automatically when you build lang/gcc42.  Does this not work?


> We are not trying to build everything with lang/gcc but just the ports 
> that have USE_GCC=any in their Makefile. 

...and those that have USE_GCC=yes in their Makefile.

The difference between USE_GCC=yes and USE_GCC=any is that the later 
is there to support the transition period and uses /usr/bin/gcc if 
present.


Personally, I would stop relying on /usr/bin/gcc (even if present)
and use the lang/gcc port in all cases.  That reduces the number of
different scenarios to test, but will pull in lang/gcc in some more 
cases and may meet some resistance therefore.

Gerald
--0-1041702911-1377480255=:3920--