From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 6 14:32:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67B3D1FA for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 14:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-f46.google.com (mail-qg0-f46.google.com [209.85.192.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 269C6C25 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 14:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id e89so7528425qgf.5 for ; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 06:32:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to:content-type; bh=xQcvRgoPe2JdJCeYAai9wY7SXknivm1qgdo+mzVYRSM=; b=BPU8Xc5nPRzvJXvcHKNkph9G6v7GXxYl0cW8E+z1BNeWsxuUG8K/9EfqWIkZuAsusO 8cT69NKlgBzxXea7d2IzVexuiLUWk+kfQ3/bhu1g1i/nrw6bwDtnHmpFC7v2HwIcl3qu t/Nx3S2+Vvj7nUseHXwxB+uknBnDxwpkH4tDUBkIUXVY7YGN5TZnxvLVndyxvoDfNdLq p5/4cPsAWtyamryCsr3g3eG/6XbhXF7yD9LaIt+vQv4mbvIuntffUgKnQXWmB6Anf3SU s/3xl2SEH7+Lxv2Tc148d6vdJ274AJjUXix4slyRp5wg37D3uvXlJnNBApL8W6qny1Nr u9Yg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl3lnEZ5w4cHuJHOKtVEym1XvFgXAVvsZl+pbGeQ/EubMNUiwsA0z0Tu3fSa5pM5Bi3Bnsw X-Received: by 10.140.40.5 with SMTP id w5mr13455289qgw.65.1394115997098; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 06:26:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jmmv@meroh.net Received: by 10.96.83.102 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 06:26:17 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [2620:0:1003:1021:5c49:13a2:f7c6:9920] From: Julio Merino Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 09:26:17 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: fLo_gcJNme7AE5f3ft5C8qDCu2s Message-ID: Subject: Should we MFC tests into stable/10? To: "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:32:32 -0000 Hello all, Keeping the testing infrastructure in sync between current and stable/10 is, in my opinion, a worthy goal. For that reason, I have (finally) pulled up a bunch of related pending changes into the branch today and will continue to do so for upcoming improvements. However, I would like to gather your opinion on what to do about the tests themselves. Do you think it's worth keeping the tests between current and stable/10 in sync wherever possible? Because we have barely just started adding tests, this will certainly involve quite a bit of churn in MFCs -- but that's probably not a big deal. The tricky^Winteresting cases will come when tests start failing in only one of the two branches :-P My opinion is now leaning towards merging everything where it makes sense. What's yours? Thanks, -- Julio Merino