Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:35:00 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org> Cc: johan@nocrew.org, net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/95665: [if_tun] "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" with TUN interface (easily reproducable with test program) Message-ID: <20060929113500.GR59833@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <451D03D5.5070809@FreeBSD.org> References: <200609272156.k8RLuV03033703@freefall.freebsd.org> <20060929104643.GQ59833@FreeBSD.org> <451D03D5.5070809@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce, On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:30:29PM +0100, Bruce M. Simpson wrote: B> >You kept the PR in feedback state for 11 hours, and then you B> >suspend the PR! Are you expecting our users to reply immediately? B> > B> The user responded saying they could not reproduce the problem further B> as they no longer had a FreeBSD system installed. Ohh, people again aren't adding neither bug-followup@ nor freebsd-gnats-submit@ to the Cc of their replies. B> Despite my best B> efforts I could not reproduce the problem with the test case given on B> RELENG_6_1 and HEAD, as I documented in the PR. The subject problem has been reported several times on the mailing lists, and I've also observed it myself in the past. There is definitely a bug that brings tun(4) to a state when nothing can be transmitted. B> Apologies for any confusion caused. No problem. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060929113500.GR59833>