Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2000 02:32:30 -0300 From: lioux@uol.com.br To: Kent Stewart <kstewart@3-cities.com> Cc: Bush Doctor <dervish@goku.cl.msu.edu>, FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, "David J. Kanter" <djkanter@nwu.edu>, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: ports/devel/codecrusader Makefile Fixes Message-ID: <20000408023230.A346@Fedaykin.here> In-Reply-To: <38EE5DB0.4C9F3668@3-cities.com>; from kstewart@3-cities.com on Fri, Apr 07, 2000 at 03:14:08PM -0700 References: <200004041002.DAA09557@freefall.freebsd.org> <38EBBDE2.47FF5BF2@3-cities.com> <20000405223501.B86568@ikhala.tcimet.net> <38EBF298.1B051729@3-cities.com> <20000405235751.A86786@ikhala.tcimet.net> <38EC1472.28B209C7@3-cities.com> <20000406170029.B98981@goku.cl.msu.edu> <38EE5DB0.4C9F3668@3-cities.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Here is what I have had to do to make Code Crusader 1.5.3 build as a > port. Well, can I package your insights and send in a patch till sunday? Is that okay with you? However, I am trying a different approach. I am building separate ports for the latest ACE and JX. Besides, I am considering writing additional ports for each lib written with the jx x11-toolkits, if that can be acomplished. This way I will be able to keep the latest libraries available without touching codecrusader. Furthermore, this will enable other JX and ACE dependent ports to be easily built. This might get done real soon if everybody keeps working this fast. :) -- regards, mferreira To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000408023230.A346>