From owner-freebsd-net Fri Oct 4 18:50:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2712737B401 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 18:50:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.wrs.com (unknown-1-11.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCC543E4A for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 18:50:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from neeraj.bhatia@windriver.com) Received: from alasilvretta (ala-silvretta [147.11.48.37]) by mail.wrs.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with SMTP id SAA01848 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 18:49:40 -0700 (PDT) From: "Neeraj Bhatia" To: Subject: IPv6 neighbor discovery question Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 19:04:15 -0700 Message-ID: <008601c26c13$83cddb80$25300b93@alasilvretta> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The stack should send out a neighbor solicitation for a global source address of a received Echo request when there are no default routers present on the link.I believe such addresses should be considered on link wrt RFC 2461 Section 5.2. Currently ip6_output will drop such a packet since there won't be a prefix route in the routing table.Is this correct behavior? Thx. -N =========================== Neeraj Bhatia IP group, Core Networking Wind River Networks (o)510.749.4633 (m)509.475.7106 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message