From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 21 20:00:05 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C345216A468 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E17813C47E for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id lBLK05v1055684 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:00:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id lBLK05DF055683; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:00:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:00:05 GMT Message-Id: <200712212000.lBLK05DF055683@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Mikhail Teterin Cc: Subject: Re: ports/118784: [PATCH] print/lyx: update to 1.5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mikhail Teterin List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 20:00:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/118784; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mikhail Teterin To: "Koji Yokota" Cc: "Ullrich Franke" , bug-followup@freebsd.org, edwin@freebsd.org, trash.esiac@gmail.com Subject: Re: ports/118784: [PATCH] print/lyx: update to 1.5.3 Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:55:13 -0500 =D0'=D1=D4=CE=C9=C3=D1 21 =C7=D2=D5=C4=C5=CE=D8 2007 12:16 =D0=CF, Koji Yok= ota =F7=C9 =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC=C9: > I don't know exactly why, but when I used USE_GCC=3D4.x, I didn't need > this specification (lower layers of directories are searched first with > gcc4?). I'm going to include them always -- it does not hurt, and who knows, which= =20 compiler the user is using anyway. Ullrich, is there a good reason to support the "included gettext" (INCGT)=20 option? I'd like to eliminate it completely, just as the bundled boost is=20 eliminated... Yours, -mi