From owner-freebsd-current Mon May 10 13:15:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from gratis.grondar.za (gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5E2151FC; Mon, 10 May 1999 13:14:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from greenpeace.grondar.za (greenpeace.grondar.za [196.7.18.132]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA57830; Mon, 10 May 1999 22:14:57 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greenpeace.grondar.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA03760; Mon, 10 May 1999 22:14:56 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <199905102014.WAA03760@greenpeace.grondar.za> To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SPAM In-Reply-To: Your message of " Mon, 10 May 1999 10:31:15 MST." <19990510173115.0AAF81586E@hub.freebsd.org> References: <19990510173115.0AAF81586E@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 22:14:56 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Jonathan M. Bresler" wrote: > with volunteers, we could moderate the list(s). mail transfer > would be slower as we wait for the moderator(s) to approve each piece > of email. if we use more than one moderator per list, the > time-sequence of email would be lost....we would get some very > strange threads...could be enteraining. Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are there difficulties that make this impossible? > the amount of spam we get is very little. its easy to delte a > couple messages. i do not believe it is worthwhile ot moderate the > lists. Do you have any stats of "accepted mail" vs "rejected mail" vs SPAM? M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message