From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 05:50:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F382916A4CE for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 05:50:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D1C43D48 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 05:50:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i8O5oJTH014989; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:50:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i8O5oJNE014988; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:50:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 01:50:18 -0400 From: Ken Smith To: Garance A Drosihn Message-ID: <20040924055018.GA14539@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <20040924050018.GA13875@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Ken Smith cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg Packages on 5.3-beta5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 05:50:21 -0000 On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 01:11:19AM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > Installing onto a new single-athlon system. i386, not amd64. > All the packages that it complained about as missing were Xorg. > Some other packages were there, but failed due to dependencies > on the missing Xog packages. Might have been that the INDEX was > out of date? Ok, I'm not sure about i386. Depending on a variety of things it can wind up being a bit of a challenge assembling the package sets for these early BETAS. That said, if anyone tests out the Alpha package set and finds problems I'd like to hear about it. I'll probably do another build of those after portmgr@ tags the tree for the release but I'll do it exactly the same way as the packages that Wilko put onto the BETA5 iso's. If there is something wrong with them I need to find out about it. :-) > And I then went to install ports, the install of cvsup failed. > Maybe that should be cvsup-without-gui ? (or was it there, and > I just selected the wrong package? I am tired enough right now > that I might not have noticed a without-gui package...) Sorry but do you mean 'port' (as in building from /usr/ports) or package (using pkg_add)? If you mean package the disc1 package set includes cvsup but not cvsup-without-gui. There should have been a cvsup-without-gui available in /usr/ports to build from. -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel |