From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jul 9 19:20:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from hecky.it.northwestern.edu (hecky.acns.nwu.edu [129.105.16.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C4B37C2E5 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 19:20:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from djkanter@northwestern.edu) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by hecky.it.northwestern.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA05629 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 21:20:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (dika-12-028128.nuts.nwu.edu [165.124.28.128]) by hecky.acns.nwu.edu via smap (V2.0) id xma005618; Sun, 9 Jul 00 21:20:25 -0500 Received: (from david@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA37858 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 21:14:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 21:14:10 -0500 From: "David J. Kanter" To: FreeBSD questions Subject: Is kernel ppp better than user ppp? Message-ID: <20000709211409.A37847@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i X-Organization: Northwestern University X-Operating-System: FreeBSD localhost.localdomain 4.0-STABLE FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have both working, but it one generally considered better than the other? Since both work I'm not interested in debugging, which apparently user ppp has the upper hand. But is one more efficient than the other? Does one have better thoroughput? -- David Kanter djkanter@northwestern.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message