From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 27 23:45:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E478C16A41C; Fri, 27 May 2005 23:45:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from info@mvcg.net) Received: from ssigc.net (c-24-147-227-219.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.147.227.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7246743D48; Fri, 27 May 2005 23:45:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from info@mvcg.net) Received: from ssigc.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ssigc.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4S0l0nG001118; Fri, 27 May 2005 20:47:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from neon-duron ([192.168.1.104]) by ssigc.net (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Fri, 27 May 2005 20:47:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001d01c5631f$38415970$6801a8c0@neonduron> From: "Tom Farrell" To: "Muhammad Reza" , , References: <4295A5C3.8070005@mra.co.id> Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 23:38:14 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Cc: Subject: Re: two ISP connections, three nics, and a NAT X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 23:45:40 -0000 Multihoming two wan links can be accomplisheed by using zebra or just ipfw and natd. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Muhammad Reza" To: ; Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:32 AM Subject: Re: two ISP connections, three nics, and a NAT > At 11:06 AM 5/12/2005, you wrote: > > > > >> I have two ISP connections, a DSL line and a Cable Modem line. I want > >> to plug both connections into a FreeBSD box that has three nics in > >> it, one nic for each ISP connection and the last nic for my NAT. How > >> can I bind the connections together without any other sort of router? > > > > > > > > > > I setup something similar that may be useful.... We have a small > > office with a 12/24ths of a T-1 line for an absurd amount of money as > > our primary connection. Cheap residential cable service became > > available with quadruple the bandwidth [incoming only] for cheap. > > > > I installed an extra NIC the to cable modem and setup the Squid proxy > > / cache on a f'bsd box that was already running other services. Then > > used some Squid options and IPFW to get all Squid's traffic running > > over the cable line. This gets us faster web and ftp downloads, and > > off-loads the T-1 for other things. > > > > -Wayne > > _______________________________________________ > > > I have similar network configuration (dual home ISP without routing > protocol enabled), and looking for some solution with BSD robust TCP/IP > stack. > PF came with this solution; > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html > but this solution is based on packet filtering anyway, not routing. You > no need to specified your default gateway and you will have problem if > you have Squid running on your gateway box or have NAT rule, that > translate your host public address into private LAN host address, and > (maybe) many more... > Meanwhile, my gateway box is Linux-2.4.x with iproute2, and can > accomplished this matter. > But i really want to change this into *BSD, i heard that guys from > OpenBSD work on this > (http://www.openbsd.org/plus36.html, Permit multiple default route), but > not worked in my test. > .. what about FreeBSD ? > > regards > .:NewBie:. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >