From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 7 07:15:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA031065670 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from boydjd@jbip.net) Received: from mail-fx0-f225.google.com (mail-fx0-f225.google.com [209.85.220.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091E78FC14 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm25 with SMTP id 25so411242fxm.3 for ; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:15:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.131.134 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 00:15:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BBC2DAB.2050704@icyb.net.ua> References: <1209800810.33861270466947931.JavaMail.root@dagobah.intersec.pl> <4BBA05A2.40706@intertainservices.com> <4BBA1823.1090305@gausus.net> <4BBA4334.1020506@interazioni.it> <4BBA4478.7030302@gausus.net> <20100405164306.hmy4n8pvs4goc8ks@www.goldsword.com> <4BBA51B9.6010803@gausus.net> <4BBC20BA.6090604@ish.com.au> <4BBC2DAB.2050704@icyb.net.ua> From: Joshua Boyd Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 03:15:16 -0400 Received: by 10.239.193.136 with SMTP id j8mr763702hbi.143.1270624536299; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:15:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: fault tolerant web servers on freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 07:15:38 -0000 On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 07/04/2010 09:05 Aristedes Maniatis said the following: > > Until we get to 'database' everything is HA and quite easy to build and > > manage. Having a clustered database solution is expensive and beyond > > most smallish budgets. mysql and postgresql don't have anything > > available that is quite ready yet (IMO), so you'll need to be talking to > > the bigger (expensive) players about their clustered offerings. > Master-master circular replication in mySQL probably fits the bill. Master-slave requires a slave to promote itself to master, which can get tricky. > > Out of curiosity: have you considered MySQL Cluster: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MySQL_Cluster > http://www.mysql.com/products/database/cluster/faq.html > > If yes, can you share your evaluation results? > Thanks! > > -- > Andriy Gapon > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Joshua Boyd JBipNet E-mail: boydjd@jbip.net Cell: (513) 375-0157 http://www.jbip.net