From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Dec 23 08:20:12 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA17731 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 08:20:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from kalypso.cybercom.net (kalypso.cybercom.net [209.21.136.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA17630 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 08:19:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ksmm@kalypso.cybercom.net) Received: from localhost (ksmm@localhost) by kalypso.cybercom.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA20782 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 11:18:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 11:18:33 -0500 (EST) From: The Classiest Man Alive To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: msdosfs win95 long file name support In-Reply-To: <199712230911.MAA00382@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Tue, 23 Dec 1997, Dmitrij Tejblum wrote: : On second thought... After 'touch AAAAA~1' and 'touch AA~99999' you will : unable to create any long filename started with 'aa'. I am not sure if : it is a Good Thing(TM). Is anybody really going to create 100,000 files that start with the same two letters in the same directory? I thought that there were limits on the number of files allowed in a directory that were lower than that. (Terry?) : (Also, my windows/system is not very large. It is only 1 cluster in : length :) I'm surprised it still works. :-) K.S.