Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:45:01 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: Luiz Otavio O Souza <lists.br@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS and large directories - caveat report Message-ID: <CAF-QHFVGWO9-sxZAw-sFyoVZVTs=HQN0AX=4OpeaGv4_qLhWLw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5542D910-0C5C-4B2B-885F-CC92901367F0@gmail.com> References: <j09hk8$svj$1@dough.gmane.org> <13577F3E-DE59-44F4-98F7-9587E26499B8@gmail.com> <CAF-QHFUs7OAAwcFvSymc3YYX3Cdq%2BQUUSP_4OFXCegCbzLkOUA@mail.gmail.com> <E3F8D6EC-2CCA-49A2-9BFD-982BF01A3531@bitgravity.com> <5542D910-0C5C-4B2B-885F-CC92901367F0@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21 July 2011 21:36, Luiz Otavio O Souza <lists.br@gmail.com> wrote: > But i guess i need to increase the arc_meta_limit as well: > > vfs.zfs.arc_meta_limit: 536870912 > vfs.zfs.arc_meta_used: 579461312 You also have arc_meta_used larger than arc_meta_limit ... but not nearly as big a difference as on my system. Can anyone speculate if raising vfs.zfs.arc_meta_limit would help?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF-QHFVGWO9-sxZAw-sFyoVZVTs=HQN0AX=4OpeaGv4_qLhWLw>