From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 24 18:51:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E052106566C for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:51:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from borisbsd@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f217.google.com (mail-ew0-f217.google.com [209.85.219.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25688FC1F for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:51:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from borisbsd@googlemail.com) Received: by ewy17 with SMTP id 17so172875ewy.43 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:51:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=l0PnrWyN1BtFcDti9LPC/84zj/z929/jH/PSoVgmJqk=; b=VIWdgOHyJ1gs//VsynfzOxuK0RmCfvoDOUd2M4tRd5u1kogyGNHbjmJyNWN0Z3kLNI AnJi8d8EXtDhzgOjgWMOOe9NkAcZyk8uHwuKm2uUXsgNKg5QGfuMXiFTHuiRtPbCETrk G4SP9jhpIYVsHhfBUZGKyRbqdOs8N2BDpQIeM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=xgz4GgvIQIAR/xqOaekQL5ITVUBUM9XSa5PwyBfVUCM8K9jwPS3cpIQic4HCeBZ5Yp e4n8JTcWM2DaMINd3vYXmowlwDFmoudOb0P+xcnHk1UgJxY+SKWi5padhH242YNX6SPG maKutTL89vIdrTotjVBaNSDdedIgr7/1p9MbA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.88.75 with SMTP id z53mr62213wee.46.1248461513795; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:51:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1247175832.1455.36.camel@zero.mshome.net> <1247602161.2105.14.camel@localhost> <301c9e6c36d74e0c66ee5731638691d1.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> <1247658678.5135.6.camel@localhost> <1248092972.1756.7.camel@localhost> <90e3c9587dbba03b2b7d253fa26adca1.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> <1248112074.1756.39.camel@localhost> <0eef4f4e9462e4fc86429b96ee215a37.squirrel@cygnus.homeunix.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:51:53 +0100 Message-ID: From: Boris To: freebsd-emulation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: VirtualBox - no screen refresh X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:51:55 -0000 I built the world and recompiled with revision 430 and I can start 32-bit VM without VT-x selected. I do not have a system crash anymore. I still cannot start 32-bit nor 64-bit VM while VT-x is checked. I got an error message. I have read it's not supported and the opposite throughout different threads. Can anybody confirm what is really supported at the moment? - 32-bit VM without VT-x ? OK for me - 32-bit VM with VT-x? - 64-bit VM with VT-x ? Thanks, Boris On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Boris wrote: > No luck for me. I have recompiled my kernel with the latest from CVS (I > noticed the pmap.c version 1.665 previous I used was 1.664). > I recompiled virtualbox rev427 as well. > > VirtualBox starts but whenever I launch a VM the system crashes just after > hitting the start button, with and without VT-x enabled. > > Worse thing is the memory dump does not complete so I have got no trace to > analyse. > > Vladimir, > > Could you confirm a few things for me please? > > - did you upgrade from 7.2 to 8-CURRENT? or did you do a fresh install from > snapshot? > > - I am using a customer kernel, I noticed you do it as well. Could you post > a diff -ruN GENERIC VBOOK for me please? > > Thanks, > > Boris > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > >> >> On Mon, July 20, 2009 14:47, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> >> I got Revision 427 compiled on amd64 unfortunately it crashes at the >> >> time of >> >> launching any VM. I have provided some details to Beat and pointed at >> >> this >> >> thread as the issue looked similar to Vladimir's one when reading the >> >> core.txt file produced after the system crash. >> > >> > It does not crash any more with very recent kernel. >> > So, probably you may do another try. >> >> I have here: >> $ uname -a >> FreeBSD xxx 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #1: Wed Jun 17 15:30:47 BRT 2009 >> root@xxx:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/xxx amd64 >> >> and got to boot debian 5 amd64 cd and right now I'm quite at the end of >> the install. this is just possible using just one cpu. when tried using >> two cpu's, somewhere before disk selection it dies. >> >> my goal is to run a linux amd64 with as much cores I can (goal is all 4) >> running folding at home (cpu intense app). >> >> I read about 3.0 lets us use VT-x and run multicore ok, anyone tested this >> ? >> >> thanks and great work on vbox and freebsd !! the port compiles fine in >> here. I just recompiled vbox. would be a good idea to recompile all ? >> >> matheus >> >> > Only issue I have - no screen refresh, and it kills whole thing for me. >> > >> >> Let's see what comes back from Beat and the folks porting the port to >> >> FreeBSD. >> >> >> >> Boris >> > >> > -- >> > Vladimir B. Grebenschikov >> > vova@fbsd.ru >> > >> >> >> -- >> We will call you cygnus, >> The God of balance you shall be >> >> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. >> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >