From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 20 20:35:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917EF106564A for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:35:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from nm2-vm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm2-vm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54C508FC0C for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:35:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.90.56] by nm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Jul 2011 20:35:28 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.125] by tm9.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Jul 2011 20:35:28 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp204.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Jul 2011 20:35:28 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 675009.16125.bm@smtp204.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: aRwKg0gVM1koDZx5WYNocnkbKXf_Ot43C5Twf5zEPy2gTQI MBCcIcwhQv8oT2kdnKMvMK326zreqV5wRdtrt_sn5EuECpfVsuyDT0yLuHKl wbPzvGlvYaPAQFF_fVGB.rCYZPzMHPWaWBpPy.HtApBkxd0Q.WlHRHWKoOrL GjzAtRK8pX1s4JJUdm_JSAWoKy0ZxbBj7i09yipXvm_AJCOGoVaHvAwsYSqk Jttg_EWu1j1KRBqGu7CtWV7evplc4VLpyN6GGV5IAFc2LtgP07HrI_ow6xH8 JwSeJ85pZ0o3ah43IReqK6QNVELhaa1LcaapfGsJR2iyfR0naEinaQKXwr8B nDdvkCjw73mK6.WrsiLck4JmpDA-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: iDf2N9.swBDAhYEh7VHfpgq0lnq. Received: from [192.168.119.20] (se@81.173.152.255 with plain) by smtp204.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Jul 2011 13:35:28 -0700 PDT Message-ID: <4E273C09.8090505@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 22:35:21 +0200 From: Stefan Esser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pyunyh@gmail.com References: <4E20BA23.13717.66C6F57@markmcconnell.iinet.com> <201107181714.07827.jhb@freebsd.org> <4F739848-E3CE-4E2C-A91E-90F33410E7AC@samsco.org> <201107190931.36492.jhb@freebsd.org> <4E26A5BE.4000909@freebsd.org> <20110720162518.GA11521@michelle.cdnetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <20110720162518.GA11521@michelle.cdnetworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disable 64-bit dma for one PCI slot only? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:35:29 -0000 On 20.07.2011 18:25, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: >> The "Rev" column is required for of devices that are not uniquely >> identified by their Vnd/Dev-IDs. (These used to exist, e.g. the Symbios >> SCSI controllers, though I'm not aware of any device that needed a >> different driver depending on the PCI revision number.) >> > > re(4) and rl(4) are one of example that needs the "Rev". Does the decision whether "re" or "rl" attaches the device depend on the revision field? This used to be the case for "ncr" and "sym", too, but one driver was extended to cover all devices supported by the other ... Anyway: I agree that the revision is significant information and should be kept in pciconf output. Regards, STefan