Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Feb 2007 07:22:26 -1000
From:      Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To:        Eric Anderson <anderson@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de>
Subject:   Re: comments on newfs raw disk ?  Safe ? (7 terabyte array)
Message-ID:  <17875.17746.301886.885155@roam.psg.com>
References:  <17873.33060.746546.773210@roam.psg.com> <200702130927.l1D9RBn9034761@lurza.secnetix.de> <17874.45261.367361.188024@roam.psg.com> <45D307C7.6020409@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 02/14/07 00:48, Randy Bush wrote:
>> 4TB
>> newfs  -b 16384 -f 2048 -i 262144
>> 
>> # time fsck -y /dev/da1
>> ** /dev/da1
>> ** Last Mounted on /mnt
>> ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
>> ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
>> ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
>> ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
>> ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
>> 2 files, 2 used, 2173822273 free (17 frags, 271727782 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation)
>> 
>> ***** FILE SYSTEM MARKED CLEAN *****
>> 
>> real    8m58.571s
>> user    0m31.769s
>> sys     0m1.246s
> 
> Perfect.. Now, if you could only leave it empty, your fscks would take 
> no time at all!! :)

sorry.  forgot to remention that this is a backup store for a dozen
systems' rdump/restores.  so it will have a few hundred large files.
so we do not expect fsck time to go radically gigh.

randy




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17875.17746.301886.885155>