From owner-freebsd-chat  Wed May 20 00:11:43 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA02949
          for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Wed, 20 May 1998 00:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.133.7.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA02908
          for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 May 1998 00:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1])
          by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA07314;
          Wed, 20 May 1998 00:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com)
Message-Id: <199805200711.AAA07314@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: Gary Kline <kline@tera.tera.com>, freebsd@atipa.com (Atipa),
        freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Why we should support Microsoft... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 19 May 1998 14:12:58 PDT."
             <13887.895612378@time.cdrom.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 00:11:06 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


> another problem who's magnitude will be dwarfed by the problems
> resulting from its "solution" - just where does this stupidity end,
> anyway?  Did we all just ingest a lot of lead paint chips in the 50's
> and 60's as children or what? :-)
> 

So what is your suggestion on how should the DOJ treat Microsoft business
pratice? 


	Amancio


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message