From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 14:38:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7B5106566C for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:38:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from monthadar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1CE8FC08 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:38:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so7001877wyf.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:38:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=RAy0hewFDV7QqpslmB+8JV4mcsRbShdEKkgVUP6j9bA=; b=W/RQHakzUuZtACwObggK/Oc62t+PiPA+VNwtexsDXFQPIsV/hy6EqjwEDLfqnFere7 YW7nyRddmjRRWNIrmpCPS1tkoMy7qKKY7FMCISKCUssHPMtsJYCXeC+2nRk/9YmfrkeB FKexKqAAFteFLRPvH2ca3LxJUfqi+0oEDEoI0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ZrvzbFOMije+32BykbEyra5ckc459N0zSIgKXdjs5AaWAh4ozNM/TknK2AhAwMo6wJ Nu1BSHwLIsl17tIWcSUOCmSFSgz+DzLKr3q7QipL/T32kAk4o6Q6Hnlvwj9L/3SIl2as iYFNWJZN8AY2lMW3Flr6MpJ8tY85G9Rmt3S68= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.156.10 with SMTP id u10mr7760913wbw.224.1296571096645; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:38:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.134.137 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 06:38:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:38:16 +0100 Message-ID: From: Monthadar Al Jaberi To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: if_alloc() page fault, VirtualBox + VIMAGE X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:38:18 -0000 Hi, I am running FreeBSD Current (201010) as guest in VirtualBox on an Ubuntu 10.04. FreeBSD is compiled with VIMAGE option. I loaded a module (my own) that calls if_alloc(IFT_IEEE80211), but I get a panic: Kernel page fault with the following non-sleepable locks held: exclusive rw ifnet_rw (ifnet_rw) r = 0 (0xc0fc8284) locked @ /usr/src/sys/net/if.c:414 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper(c0cf3cdb,1,0,0,0,...) at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x26 kdb_backtrace(19e,1,ffffffff,c0f9b194,c2fc9a1c,...) at kdb_backtrace+0x2a _witness_debugger(c0cf6408,c2fc9a30,4,1,0,...) at _witness_debugger+0x25 witness_warn(5,0,c0d2c479,3,c4070d48,...) at witness_warn+0x1fe trap(c2fc9abc) at trap+0x195 calltrap() at calltrap+0x6 --- trap 0xc, eip = 0xc0970999, esp = 0xc2fc9afc, ebp = 0xc2fc9b1c --- ifindex_alloc_locked(c0d003cf,c2fc9b36,19e,19e,c15ab714,...) at ifindex_alloc_locked+0x19 if_alloc(47,c4085a16,3,c0de9614,c32aa780,...) at if_alloc+0x85 wtap_attach(c31a7800,c40857c0,0,4,0,...) at wtap_attach+0x29 new_wtap(c32aa780,0,c2fc9bf0,c083ac9b,c3cbb200,...) at new_wtap+0x9b wtap_ioctl(c3cbb200,80045701,c31edaa0,1,c3f90b40,...) at wtap_ioctl+0x36 devfs_ioctl_f(c3cfe3b8,80045701,c31edaa0,c3185d00,c3f90b40,...) at devfs_ioctl_f+0x10b kern_ioctl(c3f90b40,3,80045701,c31edaa0,fc9cec,...) at kern_ioctl+0x20d ioctl(c3f90b40,c2fc9cec,c2fc9d28,c0cf5783,0,...) at ioctl+0x134 syscallenter(c3f90b40,c2fc9ce4,c2fc9ce4,0,0,...) at syscallenter+0x263 syscall(c2fc9d28) at syscall+0x34 Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x21 --- syscall (54, FreeBSD ELF32, ioctl), eip = 0x28181203, esp = 0xbfbfec3c, ebp = 0xbfbfec58 --- Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0x18 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc0970999 stack pointer = 0x28:0xc2fc9afc frame pointer = 0x28:0xc2fc9b1c code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 1203 (ioctl) panic: from debugger cpuid = 0 Uptime: 21s Physical memory: 495 MB Dumping 55 MB: 40 24 8 Without VIMAGE option if_alloc returns fine, I thought if I dont create any VNETs the system should behave like normal... what is the problem? Best regards, -- //Monthadar Al Jaberi