Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:29:13 GMT From: Vaclav Zeman <vhaisman@gmail.com> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/166945: patch /usr/local/share/portmanager/patch-bsd.port.mk-0.3.6 does not apply cleanly Message-ID: <201204141529.q3EFTDXe053293@red.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201204141530.q3EFU8gj096358@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 166945 >Category: ports >Synopsis: patch /usr/local/share/portmanager/patch-bsd.port.mk-0.3.6 does not apply cleanly >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sat Apr 14 15:30:08 UTC 2012 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Vaclav Zeman >Release: 8.2 >Organization: None >Environment: FreeBSD shell.sh.cvut.cz 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Sat Oct 8 16:51:11 CEST 2011 root@shell.sh.cvut.cz:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SHELLDELL amd64 >Description: /usr/local/share/portmanager/patch-bsd.port.mk-0.3.6 does not seem to work for current ports tree: patching bsd.port.mk-=>cd /usr/ports/Mk; patch < /usr/local/share/portmanager/patch-bsd.port.mk-0.3.6; Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk Tue Nov 8 01:02:51 2005 |+++ bsd.port.mk Wed Nov 16 02:16:57 2005 -------------------------- Patching file bsd.port.mk using Plan A... Hunk #1 failed at 2049. 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to bsd.port.mk.rej done >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201204141529.q3EFTDXe053293>