From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Aug 5 7:46:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from milquetoast.cs.mcgill.ca (milquetoast.CS.McGill.CA [132.206.2.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC5A37B610 for ; Sat, 5 Aug 2000 07:46:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mat@milquetoast.cs.mcgill.ca) Received: (from mat@localhost) by milquetoast.cs.mcgill.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA27403 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 5 Aug 2000 10:46:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2000 10:46:48 -0400 From: Mathew KANNER To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: normal for ntpdate? Message-ID: <20000805104648.C27218@cs.mcgill.ca> References: <20000801204118.A10984@cs.mcgill.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: Mathew KANNER's message [normal for ntpdate?] as of Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 08:41:18PM -0400 Organization: SOCS, McGill University, Montreal, CANADA Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [...Following up...] Somebody responded in private to a mail I sent to -current. I should have been using ntpdate -b /servername/ Where the -b flags should be used at startup. Thanks to the guy who responded. --Mat To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message