Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:50:19 -0800 From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> To: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Issues with 2.24 upgrade Message-ID: <20090111235019.5751C1CC0B@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:32:29 CST." <op.unl3g3t49aq2h7@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_1231717819_45131P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:32:29 -0600 > From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> > > On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:09:09 -0600, Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> wrote: > > > I have upgraded two systems following the instructions in UPDATING and > > have some issues. I'm not too sure of the significance, but I want ed > > report them. > > > > One system is new (as of Dec. 20) with gnome2, gnome2-office, > > gnome2-powertools and gnome2-fifth-toe installed from ports. > > > > First, when I ran 'pkgdb -Ff', I got: > > Duplicated origin: x11-toolkits/gtk20 - gail-1.22.3 gtk-2.14.7 > > Unregister any of them? [no] > > > > I had no idea which, if either to unregister. Similar message on > > fast-user-switch-applet-2.22.0_3 and gdm. I did not unregister any of > > them and proceeded to deinstall gtkmm and run the big portupgrade. > > Is your ports/MOVED up to date? The pkgdb is supposed to understand MOVED > (not use pkgdb/portupgrade for very long time), right? > > > At the end of the upgrade, I got the following messages: > > ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) > > * x11-toolkits/gtk20 (gail-1.22.3) > > * x11/gdm (fast-user-switch-applet-2.22.0_3) > > ! x11/gnome2 (gnome2-2.22.3_1) (install error) > > > > I ran pkgdb -Ff again and then I unregistered gail. Most (all?) gnome > > ports had the dependency corrected. I think that this was not a problem, > > but it was something I was unsure of. > > > > I then re-installed gnome2 and all appeared to be OK. I finally did > > 'portupgrade gnome-session'. This was a no-op and gnome-session had > > already been upgraded, so I did 'portupgrade -f gnome-session'. If this > > was what was expected, I think UPDATING should be updated to reflect > > this as well as the issue of the pkgdb run. > > I can add '-f' in UPDATING. Thanks for report! > > Cheers, > Mezz > > > Neither system is local to me ATM, so I have not confirmed whether Gnome > > 2.24 is working OK. I'll do that tomorrow. > > > > As always, thanks to the Gnome team for the great work! Yep. I have confirmed that those ports are in MOVED, but that was no enough to deal with the merge. It works for renames and actual moves, but merges seem beyond it's capability. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 --==_Exmh_1231717819_45131P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 06/03/2002 iD8DBQFJaoW7kn3rs5h7N1ERAmYcAJ0VR0K6R/MRCygNQb31/SS86q7raQCgk6Pp WuwcJOpkJYUfgMFhcnJMuGI= =ebu/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1231717819_45131P--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090111235019.5751C1CC0B>