From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 24 14:44:19 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id OAA15960 for current-outgoing; Sun, 24 Sep 1995 14:44:19 -0700 Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA15955 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 1995 14:44:13 -0700 Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA03933; Sun, 24 Sep 1995 14:41:08 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199509242141.OAA03933@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: kernel versions and config's rm -rf To: rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 14:41:08 -0700 (MST) Cc: fenner@parc.xerox.com, current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199509242134.OAA01414@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Sep 24, 95 02:34:43 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 721 Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > Instead of "rm -rf", maybe config could just do "make clean; rm *.h Makefile", > > to keep the "version" file around? > > I like this, it is far more appropriate than an rm -rf, but should be > reduced even further to just ``make clean; rm *.h'' and the clean: target had > better do the right things. No need to rm the Makefile, config is going > to overwrite it anyway. I can see the reasoning for rm *.h, as config and > or files{,.i386} may have changed and not rewrite all the same .h files :-(. You are both forgetting minor issues. Like vnode_if.c and syscalls.c. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.