From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Apr 23 21:12:05 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD2516A404
	for <freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:12:05 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jylefort@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mirapoint5.brutele.be (mirapoint5.brutele.be [212.68.199.150])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190C643D53
	for <freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:12:03 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jylefort@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from host-212-68-244-243.brutele.be (host-212-68-244-243.brutele.be
	[212.68.244.243]) by mirapoint5.brutele.be (MOS 3.7.3-GA)
	with ESMTP id EBL35816; Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:11:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from jsite.lefort.net (jsite.lefort.net [192.168.1.2])
	by gateway.lefort.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9179312;
	Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:11:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from jsite.lefort.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by jsite.lefort.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 545C8C13F;
	Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:11:58 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:11:58 +0200
From: Jean-Yves Lefort <jylefort@FreeBSD.org>
To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Message-Id: <20060423231158.178d0d5b.jylefort@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <1877.1145825287@critter.freebsd.dk>
References: <20060423183049.0e90ee1e.jylefort@FreeBSD.org>
	<1877.1145825287@critter.freebsd.dk>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed running on FreeBSD
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	micalg="PGP-SHA1";
	boundary="Signature=_Sun__23_Apr_2006_23_11_58_+0200_LXPn3v+zJObD7W=N"
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mirapoint5.brutele.be
X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown,
	refid=str=0001.0A090201.444BEC1B.0011,ss=1,fgs=0,
	ip=212.68.244.243, so=2005-12-15 23:46:19,
	dmn=5.1.5/2006-02-08
Cc: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: multiple of sector size I/O restriction
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
	<freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:12:05 -0000

--Signature=_Sun__23_Apr_2006_23_11_58_+0200_LXPn3v+zJObD7W=N
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 22:48:07 +0200
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:

> In message <20060423183049.0e90ee1e.jylefort@FreeBSD.org>, Jean-Yves Lefo=
rt wri
> tes:
>=20
> >Do you think it would be feasible (from a performance and/or
> >complexity standpoint) to add the necessary magic to GEOM so that the
> >restriction is lifted?
>=20
> By default: no.
>=20
> But it would be possible to write a special GEOM class to offer this
> functionality.

I'll have a look, thanks.

--=20
Jean-Yves Lefort

jylefort@FreeBSD.org
http://lefort.be.eu.org/

--Signature=_Sun__23_Apr_2006_23_11_58_+0200_LXPn3v+zJObD7W=N
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFES+2eyzD7UaO4AGoRAu4OAJwOE6AQFEGPWXBRu/wvH7TTJY/TQQCfVh01
zETW1eZyKQ/cDCO7+uEXuTw=
=u/zh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Sun__23_Apr_2006_23_11_58_+0200_LXPn3v+zJObD7W=N--