From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 19 18:20:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9637DC7; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 18:20:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hiren.panchasara@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-x231.google.com (mail-ee0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 268F82F50; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 18:20:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f49.google.com with SMTP id d41so4275392eek.8 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:20:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=bzgQAs3ns3n9s0JP/seZOtoKfHR/qE+QXp0Vj9WiorM=; b=gLCaWOmwMcHHNXbi0mrQ1UVQCW5zR8NRWr9s5hYa4o5Bopl1Ma7cetwNRVKcfC1h71 I1oX//yVdG3dJichHGJS+pk0TRbxOQddOXQB22O0zqbfMinsmZe4MmCo5FTGgSqR39JM D3rwNMYkFgLbBTBd2nF+7hwAQwE2uNt8i8xuTPj1JPC2VDbiQ4S4odU2Rdn0CA2Ohxc8 3UOAc4ONTZbprT/zV+PY3gqhK7didlzbtdhsQCuNZp0dPI/+aJlv6mtDv7X1MxAFiIIS /i+q7GOlYAkxJrYadjyxo0FiurfOxK/TWmGb4o7pCuTMcXz8CbNlwdm5Ky8LUZRcC3V9 3IlA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.14.8.199 with SMTP id 47mr397986eer.101.1379614835421; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:20:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.105.137 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:20:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1378316083.1706.0.camel@localhost> <9165aa958e7dc206da3515146181c14b.squirrel@arroway.org> <1378325846.1706.2.camel@localhost> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:20:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Dlink DIR-825 B1 trial From: hiren panchasara To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 18:20:37 -0000 On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Well, I wonder whether this is the right fix, or the auto-tuning stuff > needs to be rethought for RAM levels below their minimum testing (I think > it was 128mb.) > VM_KMEM_SIZE_SCALE=1 is already there for amd64. Where apparently auto tuning works. I do not see why it has to be 3 for the rest of the platforms. Has anyone checked if autotuning works on other platforms? I do not think so. cheers, Hiren > > > -adrian > > > On 19 September 2013 10:37, hiren panchasara wrote: > >> I've sent a proposed fix on this list yesterday but Just thought of >> following up here regarding >> "[zone: mbuf_cluster] kern.ipc.nmbclusters limit reached" >> >> >> matheus, I bet you have pretty low maxmbufmem. To bump it up, add >> following line in your kernconf file: >> options VM_KMEM_SIZE_SCALE=1 >> >> Let me know if that helps. >> >> Cheers, >> Hiren >> >> >> >