From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 17 04:30:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA0D37B401 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 04:30:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from apollo.laserfence.net (apollo.laserfence.net [196.44.69.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5272343F85 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 04:30:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@unfoldings.net) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by apollo.laserfence.net with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1967b8-000FPm-00; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 13:30:34 +0200 Received: from prometheus-p0.datel.laserfence.net ([192.168.255.1] helo=prometheus.home.laserfence.net) by apollo.laserfence.net with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1967ai-000FPT-00; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 13:30:21 +0200 Received: from phoenix.home.laserfence.net ([192.168.0.2]) by prometheus.home.laserfence.net with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1967a1-000Mz2-00; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 13:29:25 +0200 Received: from will by phoenix.home.laserfence.net with local (Exim 4.10) id 1967Zk-0001UQ-00; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 13:29:08 +0200 From: Willie Viljoen To: Miguel =?iso-8859-1?q?Gon=E7alves?= , Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 13:29:08 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304171329.08629.will@unfoldings.net> Sender: Willie Viljoen X-Spam-Score: (/) X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *1967ai-000FPT-00*phju/JXnQY.* X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020422 Subject: Re: Vinum in FreeBSD 4.x branch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:30:50 -0000 On Thursday 17 April 2003 11:45, someone, possibly Miguel Gon=E7alves, type= d: > I just want to know how is the stability and robustness of > Vinum in the 4.x branch. It's been working just fine for me for over a year now. Stay away from 5.0= =20 for the moment, it's still "semi-production", but the vinum in 4.x will do= =20 nicely.=20 If your system will have many local users, it might be prodent not to=20 compile in VFS_AIO when building your kernel. Not compiling it is the=20 default, but it does help with performance. It is however, not safe where a= =20 system has untrusted local users. Will =2D-=20 Willie Viljoen =46reelance IT Consultant 214 Paul Kruger Avenue, Universitas Bloemfontein 9321 South Africa +27 51 522 15 60 +27 51 522 44 36 (after hours) +27 82 404 03 27 (mobile) will@unfoldings.net