Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 18:18:01 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 262067] www/chromium: HAVE_MEMPCPY is undefined in third_party/nasm/include/compiler.h Message-ID: <bug-262067-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D262067 Bug ID: 262067 Summary: www/chromium: HAVE_MEMPCPY is undefined in third_party/nasm/include/compiler.h Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: chromium@FreeBSD.org Reporter: Trond.Endrestol@ximalas.info Flags: maintainer-feedback?(chromium@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: chromium@FreeBSD.org This is on 14.0-CURRENT. HAVE_MEMPCPY is undefined in third_party/nasm/include/compiler.h, resulting= in messages such as: In file included from ../../third_party/nasm/asm/directbl.c:6: In file included from ../../third_party/nasm/asm/directiv.h:9: In file included from ../../third_party/nasm/include/perfhash.h:37: ../../third_party/nasm/include/compiler.h:249:21: error: static declaration= of 'mempcpy' follows non-static declaration static inline void *mempcpy(void *dst, const void *src, size_t n) ^ /usr/include/string.h:70:7: note: previous declaration is here void *mempcpy(void * __restrict, const void * __restrict, size_t); ^ 1 error generated. My crude and simple patch involve commenting out the offending prototype in third_party/nasm/include/compiler.h. A better patch would be to ensure HAVE_MEMPCPY is defined all the way. Log file and patch will be attached soon. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-262067-7788>