From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul  3 20:18:03 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CAF9D16A4CF; Sat,  3 Jul 2004 20:18:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 35E4843D49; Sat,  3 Jul 2004 20:18:03 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666)
	id CB8295311; Sat,  3 Jul 2004 22:18:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37])
	by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP
	id 092635309; Sat,  3 Jul 2004 22:17:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602)
	id CB4C9B860; Sat,  3 Jul 2004 22:17:54 +0200 (CEST)
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
References: <200407020815.i628F5sp016504@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20040702100347.GA9202@laptop.6bone.nl> <xzpd63eipfx.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<20040702161947.GI779@laptop.6bone.nl> <xzpk6xms6ve.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<20040702215054.GA54100@xor.obsecurity.org>
From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 22:17:54 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20040702215054.GA54100@xor.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's
 message of "Fri, 2 Jul 2004 14:50:54 -0700")
Message-ID: <xzphdsorgjx.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63
cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ACPI-CA 20040527 import
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 20:18:04 -0000

Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes:
> It's a bit disingenuous to criticize someone for not building with -O2
> and then noting in the next email that there's a known bug with -O2.

No, it isn't.  The bug is there because we've been shoving that kind
of thing under the carpet for years, and the best way to stop doing
that is to make -O2 mandatory for developers.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no