From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Aug 16 22:23:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AAD314C15 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 22:23:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from bubble.didi.com (sji-ca44-42.ix.netcom.com [209.111.212.170]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA44715; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 22:22:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by bubble.didi.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id WAA57581; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 22:22:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami) To: "Stephen J. Roznowski" Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should initial package creation make /usr/ports/packages? References: <199908170306.XAA92357@cc158233-a.catv1.md.home.com> From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 16 Aug 1999 22:22:30 -0700 In-Reply-To: "Stephen J. Roznowski"'s message of "Mon, 16 Aug 1999 23:06:46 -0400 (EDT)" Message-ID: Lines: 16 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: "Stephen J. Roznowski" * I'm having a little trouble following the logic in bsd.port.mk * for the do-package step. If /usr/ports/packages doesn't exist, * should it be created when you do "make package" in a port for the * first time? * * If so, this doesn't appear to work. No, it will create a package in the current directory if /usr/ports/packages doesn't exist. No, I don't partularly like this behavior, but it's been that way for years. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message